
Playing this video loads it from YouTube (Google), which may store data on your device. See YouTube's privacy policy and our privacy and cookies page.
Do Exercise Apps That Watch You Move Actually Help?
A plain-language look at home exercise apps with camera or sensor tracking: do people exercise more, and do they get better?
Chapters
A plain-language episode on home exercise apps that track movement through the phone camera or small wearable sensors. We explain the terms as we go (adherence, randomised controlled trial, meta-analysis, MCID) and look at what recent studies found in shoulder pain, hand injuries, hip and knee replacement and knee osteoarthritis.
Key findings
- Adherence: a 2022 meta-analysis of 11 trials (1,144 people) found digital programmes improved exercise adherence at intermediate follow-up (SMD 0.53, 95% CI 0.35 to 0.70). In the short and long term, the differences were not statistically significant.
- Adherence is not recovery: in knee osteoarthritis, an app without movement tracking doubled the share of people who did all their exercises (36% vs 16%), with no significant difference in knee function.
- Tracking and feedback: in small trials, apps that tracked movement and gave real-time feedback, added to physiotherapy, improved shoulder pain and the recovery of finger movement after hand injuries more than physiotherapy alone.
- Hip replacement: wearable sensors improved a hip score, but by less than the minimal clinically important difference.
- Usability: in older adults without knee problems, a motion-analysis app that users found unstable and hard to use led to lower compliance than standard instructions.
- Most trials were small and short, and the app was usually added to physiotherapy: they show what an app adds to care, not what happens if it replaces the therapist.
Sources
- Essery R, Geraghty AW, Kirby S, Yardley L. Predictors of adherence to home-based physical therapies: a systematic review. Disabil Rehabil 2017;39(6):519-534. DOI: 10.3109/09638288.2016.1153160
- Zhang ZY, et al. Digital rehabilitation programs improve therapeutic exercise adherence for patients with musculoskeletal conditions: a systematic review with meta-analysis. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2022;52(11):726-739. DOI: 10.2519/jospt.2022.11384
- Hinman RS, et al. Mobile app to support home exercise adherence in knee osteoarthritis: a randomized clinical trial. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2026;34(4):631-640. DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2025.12.012
- Jiang C, et al. The efficiency and cost-effectiveness of wearable sensors in a digital physiotherapeutic total hip arthroplasty-specific training system: randomized controlled trial. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2026;14:e93050. DOI: 10.2196/93050
- Sornmayura P, et al. Effects of an exercise-assisting mobile app (O-RA) on rehabilitation outcomes in older adults: randomized controlled parallel clinical trial. JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol 2026;13:e80971. DOI: 10.2196/80971
- Villar-Alises O, et al. Effectiveness of an AI-based home exercise app for rehabilitation of rotator cuff-related shoulder pain: a randomized controlled trial. Musculoskelet Sci Pract 2026;85:103626. DOI: 10.1016/j.msksp.2026.103626
- Bauknecht S, et al. Physiotherapy in your pocket: effectiveness of home exercises using an AI-based smartphone app for the postoperative follow-up of hand injuries. Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir 2025;57(3):186-194. DOI: 10.1055/a-2599-8250
Further reading
- Full written summary: Home exercise apps with motion tracking: do patients do more, and do they get better?
- Previous episode: Can VR Improve Balance in Parkinson’s Disease?
This video is for educational purposes only and is not medical advice. Narration voice is AI-generated.